DeSalle v. Appelberg
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.
The defendants appeal from a judgment for the plaintiffs following a hearing before an attorney trial referee (attorney referee). The defendants claim that the trial court improperly (1) found the defendant Gustaf T. Appelberg personally liable, and (2) failed to grant a motion for mistrial and revocation of the reference to the attorney referee. We reverse the trial court’s judgment.
The genesis of this case is the alleged breach of an agreement by which the plaintiffs sold a sign business to the defendants. A promissory note represented a portion of the purchase price and was a significant…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- In Re Murchison.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Offutt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Aillon v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Cameron v. CameronSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Shelnitz v. GreenbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- DeSalle v. AppelbergConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- In re David W.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Perroni v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004