Legal Opinion

Woolery v. Grayson

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1887No. 12,207PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Erom the Lawrence Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, C. J.

The appellant petitioned for an order directing partition of real estate, and the appellees filed a counter-claim asserting title to all of the land.

The question of title may be put in issue in a suit for partition, and a counter-claim or cross-complaint is an appropriate method of presenting the question of title for the judgment of the court. Spencer v. McGonagle, 107 Ind. 410; Cooter v. Baston, 89 Ind. 185.

The counter-claim of the appellees undertakes to state the facts constituting the title asserted, and the sufficiency of the pleading must be determined from these facts, for, where a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Fischli v. FischliIndiana Supreme Court · 1825
  2. Horner v. DoeIndiana Supreme Court · 1848
  3. Reynolds v. CopelandIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Spencer v. McGonagleIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Jones v. Kokomo Building Ass'nIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Branson v. StudabakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Jones v. VertIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Finley v. CathcartIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Browning v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Davis v. LennenIndiana Supreme Court · 1890

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API