Legal Opinion
RITONDO BY RITONDO v. Pekala
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided July 26, 1994PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
275 N.J. Super. 109 (1994)
645 A.2d 802
ALEXANDER RITONDO, AN INFANT, BY HIS PARENTS AND GUARDIAN AD LITEM MARY ANN RITONDO AND VINCENT RITONDO, AND MARY ANN RITONDO AND VINCENT RITONDO INDIVIDUALLY AND IN THEIR OWN RIGHT, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
BERNARD A. PEKALA, M.D., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued March 2, 1994.
Decided July 26, 1994.
Before Judges HAVEY, ARNOLD M. STEIN and ARIEL A. RODRIGUEZ.
Ian Stuart, argued the cause for appellant (Mr. Stuart, attorney, on the brief).
Robert E. Paarz, argued the cause for respondent (Paarz, Master & Koernig,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dolson v. AnastasiaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
- Sanzari v. RosenfeldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- Ferdinand v. Agricultural Ins. Co. of Watertown, NYSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
- ROSENBERG BY ROSENBERG v. CahillSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
- Ingram v. GalliherCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1958
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hart v. City of Jersey CityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
- Kelly v. BerlinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
- Phuong Nguyen v. TamaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
- Howard v. University of Medicine and DentistryNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
- Ritondo v. PekalaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.