Legal Opinion

Ouellette v. Kenealy

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided November 13, 1984No. Docket No. 67668PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff brought suit to recover for injuries incurred in an auto accident. A jury found damages of $4,000 for serious impairment of body function and/or permanent serious disfigurement but reduced the award by 40% due to plaintiff’s own negligence. From denial of her motion for a new trial, plaintiff appeals as of right.

Plaintiff contends that the trial court erred in instructing the jury that damages for noneconomic loss were recoverable only for periods during which plaintiff suffered serious impairment of body function. We agree. The instruction was in accordance with Rusinek v Schultz,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cassidy v. McGovernMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Rusinek v. Schultz, Snyder & Steele Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1981
  3. MacDonald v. State Farm Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Argenta v. ShahanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Prince v. LottMichigan Supreme Court · 1963

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ouellette v. KenealyMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Copus v. Meemic InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Cassey Renee Williams v. Auto-Owners Insurance CompanyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. Gayle H Sigan v. Jessica a DezielMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. Ouellette v. KenealyMichigan Supreme Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API