Legal Opinion
United States v. Moore
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 26, 1979No. 78 CR. 661 (TPG)PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POLLACK, District Judge.
Indictment 78 Cr. 661 charges Michael Palmer and Sheila Richardson with conspiracy to distribute cocaine and all three defendants with possession of and intent to distribute cocaine. Each defendant moved to suppress the physical evidence seized at the scene of their arrest. The defendant Moore moved also to suppress certain statements that he made to agents of the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) shortly after his arrest. The motions were referred to the undersigned for an evidentiary hearing. For the reasons shown hereafter, the motions will be denied in…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. SantanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. EdwardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. Nancy Reed and Morris Goldsmith, A/K/A "Marlowe,"Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. David H. MooreCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Mose HollandCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Pueblo v. Meléndez RodríguezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1994
- State v. ChaissonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
- Hubert v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1981
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.