Norstar Bank v. Pickard
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum: Plaintiff, Norstar Bank, sued to recover the principal and interest due on a promissory note. Defendants interposed an affirmative defense and counterclaim based on their claim that the interest charged by the bank was usurious. Plaintiff appeals from the order of Supreme Court denying its motion to dismiss the defense and counterclaim based on usury. In support of its motion to dismiss, the bank contended that the variable rate of interest charged on the loan should be averaged over the term of the loan for the purpose of determining whether the interest rate was usurious. The…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Freitas v. Geddes Savings & Loan Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- O'Brien v. Shearson Hayden Stone, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1978
- Lincoln First Bank v. RupertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- McConnell v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1978
- Wiseman v. KnausAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Norstar Bank v. Pickard & AndersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989