Legal Opinion
In Re Tomasevic
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida
Decided February 20, 2002No. 99-14375-8C3PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEBTOR’S MOTION TO COMPEL ANSWERS AND FOR SANCTIONS
C. TIMOTHY CORCORAN, III, Bankruptcy Judge.
This case came on for a hearing on February 5, 2002, of the debtor’s motion to compel answers and for sanctions (Document No. 98). The debtor filed the motion on July 2, 2001. In it the debtor seeks damages for Washington Mutual Bank’s (“Washington Mutual” or “the bank”) alleged violation of 12 U.S.C. § 2605(e) 1 (“Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act” or “RE SPA”) in connection with what the debtor characterizes as a “qualified written request” contained in his letter of February 21,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Matter of ChapmanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991
- Wickham v. United American Bank (In Re Property Leasing & Management, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1985
- Rawlings v. Dovenmuehle Mortgage, Inc.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 1999
- Katz v. Dime Sav. Bank, FSBDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1997
- Johnstone v. Bank of America, N.A.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2001
3Cited by17 opinions
- Moore v. Mortgage Electronic Registration System, Inc.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2012
- Hutchinson v. Delaware Savings Bank FSBDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2006
- Maxwell v. Fairbanks Capital Corp. (In Re Maxwell)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2002
- McLean v. GMAC Mortgage Corp.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2009
- Payne v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (In Re Payne)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 2008
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.