Think Pink, Inc. v. Rim, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward H. Lehner, J.), entered June 30, 2004, which, after a nonjury trial, dismissed the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
There is no reason to disturb the trial court’s determination, which was based on a fair interpretation of the evidence, turning largely on credibility (see Thoreson v Penthouse Intl., 80 NY2d 490, 495 [1992]). Contrary to plaintiffs contention, there was no basis for a missing document charge since defendant did not fail to comply with a discovery order. We disagree with plaintiff’s interpretation of that order…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Thoreson v. Penthouse International, Ltd.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Ashland Management Inc. v. JanienNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Abbott v. Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
3Cited by3 opinions
- Haynes v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Chichilnisky v. Trustees of Columbia UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Haynes v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016