Legal Opinion
Chichilnisky v. Trustees of Columbia University
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 3, 2008PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Leland DeGrasse, J.), entered December 4, 2007, which granted defendant’s motion to strike plaintiffs jury demand and denied plaintiffs motion to compel supplemental disclosure pursuant to CPLR 3101 (h), unanimously modified, on the law, to direct a trial by jury of defendant’s counterclaims, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.
While the motion court correctly held that plaintiff waived her right to a jury trial by joining claims for legal and equitable relief arising out of the same transactions and occurrences (see Kaplan v Long Is. Univ., 116 AD2d…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hudson View II Associates v. GoodenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Kaplan v. Long Island UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Think Pink, Inc. v. Rim, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Green v. Staten Island HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sullivan v. Troser Management, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Gonzalez v. MilesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- Behljulhevic v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- CRC Ins. Servs., Inc. v. KullmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022