Legal Opinion
National Labor Relations Board v. Frantz and Company, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided May 24, 1966No. 15419_1PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HASTINGS, Chief Judge.
The National Labor Relations Board has petitioned this court for enforcement of its order requiring Frantz & Company, Inc., inter alia, to cease and desist from granting its employees benefits in order to discourage union membership or activity and from refusing to bargain with Chauffeurs, Teamsters and Helpers “General” Local 200, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America (union), as the exclusive representative of its employees in the appropriate unit.
In November, 1964, seven of Frantz’s ten employees (in an appropriate…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Medo Photo Supply Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Franks Bros. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- National Labor Relations Board v. Exchange Parts Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- National Labor Relations Board v. Stow Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
- National Labor Relations Board v. Armco Drainage & Metal Products, Inc., Fabricating DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1955
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Tennessee Packers, Inc., Frosty Morn DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1967
- First Lakewood Associates v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
- Simpson Electric Company, a Division of American Gage and MacHine Company, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
- Borden Cabinet Corporation v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1967
- National Labor Relations Board v. J. Taylor Mart, Inc., D/B/A Taylor's I. G. A. FoodlinerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.