Legal Opinion

Gleadall v. Kenney

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 16, 1903No. Appeal, No. 74PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal, No. 74, Oct. T., 1903, by defendant, from order of C. P. No. 1, Phila. Co., March T., 1903, No. 2600, discharging rule to open judgment, in case of Hannah A. Gleadall, Assignee of Mary E. Kahmer, v. Margaret Kenney. Rule to open judgment. The facts appear by the opinion of the Superior Court. Error assigned was order discharging rule to open judgment.

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

The lease under which the defendant became tenant of the premises in question, purported to be made by “ Mary Kahmer *577through her agent John K. Stokley,” and was signed and sealed by him as well as by the defendant. It was executed on March 22, 1902, and on April 29, 1902, was assigned by Mary Kahmer, by writing under seal, to the present plaintiff. The term of the lease was one year from April 10, 1902. The defendant covenanted to surrender possession “ at the expiration of said term,” and agreed that if she should violate any of the covenants of the lease an amicable action and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stewart v. JacksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
  2. Schultz v. BurlockSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1898

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Flomar Corp. v. LogueSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  2. Waldman v. BaerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  3. Forgeng v. Blank.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API