Legal Opinion

Waldman v. Baer

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 25, 1923No. Appeal, 86PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Linn, J.,

This appeal has two complaints: 1, that judgment was not stricken off for apparent irregularity; 2, that it was not opened to a defense on the merits.

1. The judgment was entered pursuant to a warrant in a lease. The lease provided that “......H. Waldman by H. Windt & Company herein called lessor, hereby leases to Joseph Baer......for the term of two years commencing on the 1st day of August, 1920......” It was signed by Joseph Baer as lessee and by “H. Windt & Co. Agts.” It bore a written assignment to Lena Gottlieb executed by Henry Waldman on December 31, 1921. By the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Isman v. NiedermanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  2. Edmundson v. Singer Sewing Machine Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  3. Penna. Co. for Insurance on Lives & Granting Annuities ex rel. McCarroll v. ShanahanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
  4. Gleadall v. KenneySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1903

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Forgeng v. Blank.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API