Legal Opinion
Barry v. Ficco
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided September 26, 2005No. CIV.A. 03-CV10686RGSPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
STEARNS, District Judge.
Upon review of the Magistrate Judge’s Report and the petitioner’s objections, I will adopt her Recommendation and order the petition dismissed. The Magistrate Judge correctly concludes that both grounds asserted in the petition are barred by procedural default. She is also correct that a motion to suppress would not have succeeded in light of the custodial inventory rule of United States v. Edwards, 415 U.S. 800, 807-808, 94 S.Ct. 1234, 39 L.Ed.2d 771 (1974). See also Illinois v. Lafayette, 462 U.S.…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Powell v. TompkinsDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2013
- Bone v. Attorney GeneralDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015
- DYKENS v. AllenDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2008
- Melendez v. ZoldakDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2025