State v. Seeley
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.
The principal issue in this appeal is whether, in a trial to the court, the state presented sufficient evidence in its case-in-chief to support the conviction of the defendant, James Seeley, of forgery in the second degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-139(a)(1) 1 in connection with a document created to facilitate the purchase of a vehicle on behalf of a corporation. 2 In challenging the sufficiency of the evidence presented, the defendant claims that we should exercise our supervisory authority over the administration of justice to abandon the waiver rule 3 in the context of court…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. TrineSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- State v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- State v. DecaroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- State v. RutanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- State v. HendersonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. JosephsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
- State v. AbrahamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2022
- State v. LamantiaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2020
- State v. FrantzSupreme Court of Kansas · 2022
- State v. JonesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2022
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.