Legal Opinion
Continental Insurance v. Arkwright Mutual Insurance
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided December 19, 1996No. 96-1596PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CYR, Circuit Judge.
Appellants Continental Insurance Company (“Continental”) and Hartford Insurance Company (“Hartford”) (collectively: “C & H” or “appellants”) challenge the district court’s summary judgment ruling under New York law that damage from flooding was not covered under the insurance policy issued by Arkwright Mutual Insurance Company (“Arkwright” or “appellee”). As the district court correctly applied New York law, we affirm,
j
BACKGROUND
In 1992, Olympia and York Development Company, L.P. (“Olympia”) owned a highrise office building at 55 Water Street, New York, New York (“Water…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Technicon Electronics Corp. v. American Home Assurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Bird v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Alexis v. McDonald's Restaurants of Massachusetts, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. AnnunziataNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Ace Wire & Cable Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Robert J. SACRAMONA, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. BRIDGESTONE/FIRESTONE, INC., and the Budd Company, Defendants, AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- Montefiore Medical Center v. American Protection InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Davidson Hotel Co. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2001
- Daniels-Recio v. Hospital Del Maestro, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- City of West Liberty v. Employers Mutual Casualty CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 2019
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.