Legal Opinion
Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Isham
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided October 25, 1991No. Civ. A. 90-B-1983, 90-B-2004PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BABCOCK, District Judge.
Defendants Robert and Eleanor Isham (the Ishams) move for judgment on the pleadings, contending that plaintiff’s action for negligence and breach of fiduciary duty is preempted by 12 U.S.C. § 1821(k) of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act of 1989 (FIRREA). The Ishams also contend that C.R.S. § 11-5-107 requires dismissal. Defendant George C. Engel (Engel) joins in that motion and also moves for summary judgment, arguing that the plaintiff lacks standing and that § 1821(k) precludes actions based upon any standard…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Dole v. United SteelworkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Commissioner v. EngleSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Norfolk Redevelopment & Housing Authority v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. of VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Robert Garcia v. Douglas E. Hall and Danny L. MangusCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- Audio-Visual Marketing Corporation, and Cross-Appellees v. Omni Corporation, and Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. CanfieldCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. Gonzalez-GorrondonaDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1993
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. FarmerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MintzDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1993
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. HeisermanDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1993
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.