Legal Opinion
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Mintz
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided March 2, 1993No. 92-6779-CIVPublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
GONZALEZ, District Judge.
THIS CAUSE has come before the Court upon the defendants’ motions to dismiss complaint. The FDIC has responded to the motions in a consolidated pleading and the defendants have replied in a timely fashion. The motion is now ripe for disposition. Though the defendants have moved to dismiss in separate pleadings, the subject matter of the motions is the same and will be treated accordingly.
The FDIC filed this action against the defendants who are former officers , and directors of Cypress Savings Association. The suit seeks to recover damages for breach of…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Louisiana Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. FCCSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- City of Milwaukee v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Smith v. Van GorkomSupreme Court of Delaware · 1985
- AFM Corp. v. Southern Bell Tel. & Tel.Supreme Court of Florida · 1987
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Central Savings and Loan Association v. Daniel T. McSweeney Frederick C. StalderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. StahlCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. GallagherCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. FarmerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
- Resolution Trust Corporation v. GallagherCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. O'Bear, Overholser, Smith & HufferDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1993
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.