Legal Opinion
Strickland v. Primex Technologies
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
Decided June 25, 2003No. CA 02-778Published
1Opinion of the Court
120 S.W.3d 166 (2003)
Charlotte STRICKLAND
v.
PRIMEX TECHNOLOGIES, et al.
No. CA 02-778.
Court of Appeals of Arkansas, Divisions I, IV.
June 25, 2003.
Robert L. Depper, Jr., El Dorado, for appellant.
Shackleford, Phillips, Wineland & Ratcliff, P.A., by: Norwood Phillips, El Dorado, for appellees.
JOHN MAUZY PITTMAN, Judge.
The appellant in this workers' compensation case filed a claim for benefits asserting that she contracted an occupational disease while employed by appellee Primex Technologies. The Commission denied her claim on the basis of its finding that she failed to give the…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Poulan Weed Eater v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2002
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. SandsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2002
- Emerson Elec. v. GastonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001
- Strickland v. Primex TechnologiesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2003
- Horticare Landscape Management v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.