Blum v. William Goldman Theatres, Inc.

BIGGS, Chief Judge.

The two appeals at bar are an outgrowth of a prior litigation between the same parties which terminated in a judgment of the court below1 affirmed by this court.2 *909with a modification not herein pertinent.3 The judgment referred to directed the defendant, hereinafter designated “Goldman,” to convey 4 to the plaintiffs Frank and Sara J. Blum, hereinafter referred to as “Blum,” certain tracts of land in Upper Darby, Pennsylvania, known as the 69th Street Theatre property, consisting of a theatre, a number of stores, and approximately 40 apartments. It further directed Goldman…