Carson & Rand Lumber Co. v. Holtzclaw
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri
On Motion to Strike a Petition for Removal from the Files.
1Opinion of the CourtThayer, J.
The only questions that can properly be considered on a motion of this character are (1) whether the petition for removal shows on its face that the amount involved in the controversy is insufficient to give this court jurisdiction; and (2) whether the applicant for removal can remove the case, in view of the fact that he originally brought the suit in the state court to recover a sum of less than $2,000, and that his right to now remove the suit under “the local prejudice clause” of the act of March 3, 1887, is predicated solely on the fact that the original defendant has filed a large…
2Cited by12 opinions
- Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. SheetsSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Haney v. WilcheckDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1941
- Bankers Securities Corp. v. Insurance Equities Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1936
- Price & Hart v. T. J. Ellis & Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Arkansas · 1904
- McKown v. Kansas & T. Coal Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Arkansas · 1901
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.