Legal Opinion
Arthur Moore v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided November 2, 1959No. 7906_1PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Per curiam
The indictment in this case, based upon Title 26 U.S.C. §§ 7302 and 5685(b), Internal Revenue Code, charged that Wa-verly Jordon, Wilbur Jordon, Albert Cecil Foreman, Milton Foreman and Arthur Moore “did unlawfully and wilfully have or possess certain property, to-wit: One low pressure boiler and one gasoline pressure tank, which said property was intended for use in violating the provisions of the Internal Revenue laws or regulations prescribed under such law; that is to say, the said property was designed and intended to be used for the unlawful distillation of spirits * * The case as to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Bell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1951
- Stoppelli v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
- Jerome D. Linden, Robert R. Baylis, Classified Business Directory, Inc., and Directory Listings, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1958
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- White v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1988
- United States v. D. Spencer Grow and C. Oran MensikCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1968
- Metz v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1970
- United States v. Wayne Ladell StroupeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1976
- Nichols v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1968
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.