Legal Opinion

Smith v. United States

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided April 23, 2014No. Civil Action No. 2014-0697Published

1Opinion of the Court

FILED UNITED sTATEs DISTRICT CoURT APR 23 ZW* FoR THE DISTRICT oF CoLUMBIA C‘;'gr'§s~ ‘£L~r$t~hil|s)f|rslg[=f| § Bf=rékrlunrgilr l` C 0 Ol|m 3 Thomas Edward Smith, Jr., ) ) Plainriff, ) ) v- ) _ _ > /'}¢ ’ 5 77 United States of Amer1ca, ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter is before the Court on plaintiffs pro se complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court will grant plaintiffs in forma pauperis application and will dismiss the case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See Fed. R. Civ. P. l2(h)(3) (requiring dismissal "at any time" jurisdiction is found…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Buaiz v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
  3. Spahr v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
  4. Gust v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API