Legal Opinion

McDowd v. Pig'n Whistle Corp.

California Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1945No. L. A. 19232PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff entered on the verdict of a jury in a negligence action. The chief contention made by appellant for reversal of the judgment is that the trial judge permitted the jurors to separate after the case was submitted to them.

The record discloses that after the case had been submitted to the jurors for their deliberation, at the request of the trial judge, they were returned to the courtroom at about 5 o’clock in the afternoon, and questioned by him as to whether they could reach a verdict. Receiving conflicting views from the jurors the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People v. YeagerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Loper v. MorrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Gile v. HudnuttMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Saltzman v. Sunset Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Supreme Court · 1899
  5. ULM v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. People v. GorgolCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  2. People v. MartinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. Kealoha v. TanakaHawaii Supreme Court · 1962
  4. People v. WerweeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. Bailey v. Tennessee Coal, Iron and Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1954

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API