Legal Opinion
Stamford Extract Manufacturing Co. v. Stamford Rolling Mills Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 28, 1924PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.
The assignments of error are all in the form, “whether or not the court erred,” etc., and are not in proper form, and have the result of stating the claimed errors in an indefinite way not clearly related to the findings. We have disapproved of such assignments many times. Antel v. Poli, 100 Conn. 64, 68, 123 Atl. 272. However, we exercise our discretion and consider the errors claimed in so far as they seem material, because of the importance of the case.
The plaintiffs and their predecessors in title are the lowest riparian owners on the Noroton River in Stamford. They are also the owners of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Strobel v. . Kerr Salt Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Parker v. GriswoldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1845
- Antel v. PoliSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
- Ingraham v. HutchinsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1818
- Warren v. . ParkhurstNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Dimmock v. City of New LondonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- Southern New England Ice Co. v. Town of West HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- Thompson v. Kraft Cheese Co.California Supreme Court · 1930
- Harvey Realty Co. v. Borough of WallingfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Gruber v. KleinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.