Legal Opinion
Southern New England Ice Co. v. Town of West Hartford
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 15, 1932PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.
The complaint alleges that, by reason of pollution occasioned by an overflow sewer which formed a part of the defendant’s sewer system, the plaintiff has been deprived of the use of a natural ice pond, the ice upon which it claimed the right to harvest for sale in its business as an ice dealer. The trial was long and the trial court has made a lengthy and careful finding of facts. This finding the defendant seeks to have corrected in many respects. Any attempt to rehearse the facts found or to deal with the claims for correction in detail would unduly prolong this opinion. We shall only refer…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Hoffman v. City of BristolSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- Platt Bros. v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1900
- Regan v. N. York and N. England R. R. Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1891
- Cables v. Bristol Water Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
- Nolan v. City of New BritainSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1897
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Schneider National Carriers, Inc. v. BatesTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- Filisko v. Bridgeport Hydraulic Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Starr v. Commissioner of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Peterson v. Town of OxfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Nailor v. C. W. Blakeslee & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.