Legal Opinion

Sanders v. Freeland

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1958No. 6205PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McGHEE, Justice.

On May 19, 1954, appellant made a written contract with appellee to sell his equity in a farm which was conditioned upon completion of appellee’s May 14 contract of sale and exchange of his farm plus $40,000 to one Haskel Markham. The sale to Markham was never completed, and the defendant did not go through with his purchase from the plaintiff. The plaintiff brought action on the contract’s liquidated damages clause.

Plaintiff’s agent to sell the property is an intervenor in this action for his commission.

The court found that the contract between defendant and Markham was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jacksonville, Mayport, Pablo Railway & Navigation Co. v. HooperSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Williams v. EnglerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Fuller v. CrockerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Wood v. BartolinoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Canaras v. Lift Truck Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  2. Terrel v. Duke City Lumber Company, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. Davies v. BoydNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Reinhart v. Rauscher Pierce Securities Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. Board of Education, Gadsden Independent School Dist. No. 16 v. James Hamilton Construction Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API