Legal Opinion
Flood v. Empire Investment Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided April 20, 1926No. 16697PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) We hardly think that the proposed amendment to the bill of exceptions is necessary. See Civil Code (1910), §§ 6183, 5205; Whitfield County v. Hogan, 17 Ga. App. 685 (87 S. E. 1087); Phelps v. Belle Isle, 29 Ga. App. 571 (5) (116 S. E. 217); Federal Life Ins. Co. v. Walton, 34 Ga. App. 694 (1) (131 S. E. 90); Gunn v. Wood, 99 Ga. 70 (24 S. E. 407). But whether so or not, the judgment excepted to having expressly said that the certiorari was “overruled,” the plaintiff in error, since he desires it, should be allowed to amend the bill of exceptions so as to…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Lytle v. Scottish American Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Griffin v. HendersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Bank of Lumpkin v. Farmers State BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
- Pope v. MarshallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
- Southern Railway Co. v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- American Chain & Cable Co. v. BrunsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Hinton v. Mack Purchasing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
- Lunsford v. FerrellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
- Martin v. Pacific MillsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
- Talley v. Commercial Credit Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.