Legal Opinion

Martin v. Pacific Mills

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 13, 1931No. 13135PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Cothran.

These four cases were tried together by agreement before a magistrate of Richland County. The complaints are identical, except that a different defendant is joined with the Pacific Mills in each case, and except as to the amount claimed in each case. It will be necessary therefore only to consider the appeal in one case, that of the plaintiff against Pacific Mills and J. W. Cleary; the conclusion as to it will control the disposition of the other three cases.

The action is based upon a written instrument executed and delivered by J.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Scott v. LloydSupreme Court of the United States · 1835
  2. Cotton v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  3. Tennessee Finance Co. v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1922
  4. Kansas City, Memphis & Birmingham Railroad v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  5. McWhite v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brown v. CrandallSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1950
  2. Oeland v. Kimbrell's Furniture Co., Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1947
  3. State Ex Inf. Taylor v. Salary Purchasing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API