Legal Opinion

Ruiz v. Kinsella

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided March 14, 2011No. Case 09 C 7358PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

HARRY D. LEINENWEBER, District Judge.

Before the Court are the Motions to Dismiss filed by Defendants John Kinsella, Sidney Diamond, FCL Builders, Inc., Dan Januszyk, Stan-Lee Kaderbek, Mark Limanni, and the City of Chicago (hereinafter, the “Defendants”). For the reasons explained below, the Court grants the Motions and dismisses with prejudice Counts I, II, III, VIII, and IX in Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint against all Defendants, including John Knight and Ralph Schmidt, and declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the pendent Illinois state law…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Griffin v. BreckenridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Swanson v. Citibank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Armbrister v. Pushpin Holdings, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2012
  2. Manning v. SweitzerDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2012
  3. Catinella v. County of CookDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2016
  4. Michalowski v. RutherfordDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
  5. Grabianski v. Bally Total Fitness Holding Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2012

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API