State v. Perry

We affirm essentially for the reasons stated in the opinion of the Appellate Division, 128 N. J. Super. 188 (1973). We feel compelled, however, to add some additional comments in view of the observations made by the dissent.

The basic and only objection of the dissent to the prosecutor’s summation is that “the Jury was called upon' to confront the larger issue of police corruption in general and, by its verdict, to redress the injustices visited by society upon thé disadvantaged.” This criticism is allegedly predicated upon the two references in the closing statements:

*47All the Willie Lee…