Kunath v. Bremer
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by Euring & Geiger, the attorneys for the plaintiffs in the above-entitled action, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 9th day of October, 1899, granting the plaintiffs’ motion for a substitution of attorneys, and directing a referee to sell, appointed in the action, to deliver a deed upon payment by the plaintiffs of the referee’s costs and expenses and the sum…
Read the full summary
Appeal by Euring & Geiger, the attorneys for the plaintiffs in the above-entitled action, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 9th day of October, 1899, granting the plaintiffs’ motion for a substitution of attorneys, and directing a referee to sell, appointed in the action, to deliver a deed upon payment by the plaintiffs of the referee’s costs and expenses and the sum of $350.
1Opinion of the Court
Hatch, J.:
The judgment of foreclosure and sale directed the referee to pay to the plaintiffs or their attorneys the sum of $377.19, adjudged to the plaintiffs for costs and disbursements, and the further sum of $498.29 adjudged to the plaintiffs as an additional allowance. The plaintiffs claim that the mortgage was foreclosed in pursuance of an agreement with one Hugo Cohn, who represented himself as an attorney, and whom they hired to foreclose the mortgage for the agreed sum of $350, and that they never employed Euring & Geiger, *272the attorneys who prosecuted the foreclosure action, as their…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bevins v. AlbroNew York Supreme Court · 1895
3Cited by1 opinion
- Buchman & Buchman v. Lanston Industries, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1960