Legal Opinion

Schmitz v. 75th & Exchange Drug Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 22, 1940No. Gen. No. 40,799PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McSurely

May 4, 1938, plaintiff recovered in the municipal court of Chicago a judgment against Abraham Ginsburg and May Ginsburg, his wife, for $150 and costs; upon return of execution unsatisfied the present garnishment action against the 75th & Exchange Drug Co., Inc., was commenced wherein, after the filing by the garnishee of its third successive answer of “no funds” to the third separate garnishment demand made upon it, the court found there was due Mr. Ginsburg, the judgment debtor, from the garnishee defendant, $75, and that this sum be recovered by Ginsburg for the use of the plaintiff.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Larson v. McCormackAppellate Court of Illinois · 1936
  2. Campagna ex rel. Kolarik v. Automatic Electric Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1938
  3. Hibernian Banking Ass'n v. MorrisonIllinois Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Liberty Leasing Co. v. Crown Ice MacHine Leasing Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  2. Baron v. VillarealAppellate Court of Illinois · 1968
  3. Molner v. South Chicago Sav. BankCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
  4. Roseland Cab Co. ex rel. Hibley v. Savings Mutual Casualty Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API