Legal Opinion
Brooks v. Hutchinson
Washington Supreme Court
Decided November 24, 1931No. 23365. Department TwoPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMillard, J.
— The trial of this action, which was brought to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained in a collision of automobiles, resulted in a verdict for the defendants. Upon plaintiffs ’ motion therefor, based upon all of the statutory grounds, a new trial was granted. The formal order entered by the court reads as follows:
“This matter having come on regularly for hearing on motion of the plaintiffs [naming them] for a new trial in this action, the court having heard the argument of counsel and having taken the matter under advisement a,nd duly considered the same,
“It is now…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Shook v. HughesWashington Supreme Court · 1927
- Applewhite v. WayneWashington Supreme Court · 1929
- MacHenheimer v. FalknorWashington Supreme Court · 1929
3Cited by4 opinions
- Henry v. LarsenWashington Supreme Court · 1943
- Forbus v. KnightWashington Supreme Court · 1945
- Johnsen v. Pheasant Pickling Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1933
- Mullin v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1943