Legal Opinion

MacHenheimer v. Falknor

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1929No. 21427. Department TwoPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFrench, J.

Respondent recovered judgment against appellants for personal injuries, the case having been tried by the court with a jury. Following the verdict, appellant school district made a motion for a new trial on some ten grounds, and both appellants made motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. The motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict having been granted, the case was appealed to this court and reversed. Machenheimer v. Falknor, 144 Wash. 27, 255 Pac. 1031. Thereafter the motion for new trial coming on for hearing, the court entered the following order:

“After hearing arguments…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Crowl v. West Coast Steel Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Morehouse v. City of EverettWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  3. MacHenheimer v. FalknorWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Shook v. HughesWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Cannon v. Seattle Title Trust Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tucker v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Desautel v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Brooks v. HutchinsonWashington Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API