Legal Opinion
Edwards v. District of Columbia
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided August 5, 1949No. 814PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOOD, Associate Judge.
Appellants Edwards and Goldreich were jointly charged with keeping for sale and selling alcoholic beverages without first *287having obtained a license so to do.1 pellants Campbell, White and Shirley were jointly charged with the same offenses. By agreement all were tried together. A jury found all guilty. The offenses took place at a meeting or rally sponsored by several organizations. According to witnesses for the government Edwards and Goldreich were in charge of activities and the other appellants made the actual sales. Defense testimony was that no alcoholic beverage…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Clyde Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Hyde v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- McDonald v. PlessSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Williamson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Rakes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1948
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
- Khaalis v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Dixon v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- People v. ChildersNew York Supreme Court · 1967
- Young v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1954
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.