Marion v. State

Miller, Judge.

A jury found Dequindre Marion guilty of possession of marijuana with the intent to distribute and possession of cocaine. Following the denial of his motion for new trial, Marion appeals, challenging (1) the sufficiency of the evidence, (2) the denial of his motion to suppress, and (3) the admission of a similar transaction. For the following reasons, we affirm.

1. In his first enumeration, Marion contends that the evidence was insufficient to sustain his convictions. On appeal from a criminal conviction, we view the evidence in a light most favorable to the verdict, and the…