Legal Opinion

Assaad v. Thomas

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 6, 1987No. 8615SC1201PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Chief Judge.

The record filed in this case consists of 14 pages, the transcript is made up of over 700 pages, plaintiffs brief consists of 106 pages and there are numerous exhibits. Plaintiff has failed to follow the Rules of Appellate Procedure in that she has failed to set out her assignments of error and exceptions in her briefs “argument” section. Rule 28(b)(5) provides that “[exceptions not set out in the appellant’s brief, or in support of which no reason or argument is stated or authority cited, will be taken as abandoned.” Additionally, in her brief, she has attempted to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hunt v. BradshawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  2. Younts v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. Beaver v. HancockCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  4. Odell v. LipscombCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Henderson v. LeBauerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  2. Shumaker Ex Rel. Shumaker v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1988
  3. Johnson v. N.C.D.O.H.R.North Carolina Industrial Commission · 1995
  4. Johnson v. N.C.D.O.H.R.North Carolina Industrial Commission · 1995
  5. Sumlin v. N.C. Dept. of CorrectionNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API