Legal Opinion

Veilleux v. Atochem North America, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 27, 1991No. 1162, Docket 90-7979PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

Joseph J. Veilleux, Jr. and other named plaintiffs, suing on behalf of a class of just over seven hundred former employees of Pennwalt Corporation, appeal from a October 9, 1990 judgment of the District Court for the Western District of New York (David G. Larimer, Judge). On cross-motions for summary judgment the district court dismissed their suit seeking separation benefits allegedly denied in violation of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq.

The Veilleux class comprises former employees of the Pharmaceutical Division of Pennwalt Corporation…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Blau v. Del Monte Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  2. York v. First Presbyterian ChurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Reichelt v. Emhart Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Pens. Plan Guide P 23918c Raymond K. Panaras v. Liquid Carbonic Industries Corporation and Cbi Industries, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  2. Fischman v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Connecticut, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1991
  3. Christie v. K-Mart Corp. Employees Retirement Pension PlanDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1992
  4. Langman v. LaubCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  5. Dall v. Chinet Co.District Court, D. Maine · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API