Legal Opinion

Buddy Lee Attractions, Inc. v. William Morris Agency

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided September 21, 1999No. 01A01-9804-CH-00185Published

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE FILED September 21, 1999 BUDDY LEE ATTRACTIONS, INC., ) ) Cecil Crowson, Jr. Plaintiff/Appellee, ) Appellate Court Clerk ) Davidson Chancery VS. ) No. 94C-2578 ) WILLIAM MORRIS AGENCY, INC. ) Appeal No. and JOSEPH E. HARRIS, ) 01A01-9804-CH-00185 ) Defendants/Appellants. ) OPINION CONCURRING IN PART & DISSENTING IN PART I concur with the court’s conclusion that this case must be retried because the trial court erroneously granted a summary judgment regarding the validity of Mr. Harris’s 1991 contract with Buddy Lee Attractions, Inc. However, I…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hutton v. WattersTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Payne v. Western & Atlantic RailroadTennessee Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Arnold v. Mayor of KnoxvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Shousha v. Matthews Drivurself Service, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Emmco Insurance Co. v. Beacon Mutual Indemnity Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1959

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API