Legal Opinion

Chase v. Matsu Manufacturing, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 11, 2005No. 04-1613, 04-1671Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, District Judge.

Plaintiffs-appellants, J. Michael Chase (“Mr.Chase”) and J. Michael Chase & Associates, Inc. (“JMC & A”), appeal the district court’s summary judgment ruling that defendants-appellees, Matsu Manufacturing, Inc. (“Matsu”) and Matcor Automotive, Inc. (“Matcor”), were excused from paying future commissions on existing (“old”) and “new” business when Mr. Chase became “inactive.” Defendants appeal the district court’s ruling that allowed plaintiffs leave to amend the complaint to state a claim for statutory damages under the Michigan Sales Representative Act (“MSRA”),…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Paul Moore v. City of Paducah Mayor John Penrod Joe Viterisi, Harold Ford, Robert Coleman, and Joe Flynn, Commissioners Robert E. GreenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
  4. Johnnie Wade v. Knoxville Utilities BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  5. Donna Cockrel v. Shelby County School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API