Legal Opinion

Cronin v. Chrosniak

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 23, 1988PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Order and judgment unanimously reversed on the law without costs and motion denied. Memorandum: Special Term erred in granting summary judgment in favor of defendants Andrew and Ann Brown.

The instant action arose out of an occurrence when a pit bull dog owned by defendants Diane and John Chrosniak attacked and seriously injured infant plaintiff Katherine Nappo, then six years of age. The attack occurred while plaintiff was playing in the backyard of the home located next door to the Chrosniaks, who leased the premises from defendants Brown, who were nonresidents of the leased premises. Only…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. GTF Marketing, Inc. v. Colonial Aluminum Sales, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Strunk v. ZoltanskiNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Zwinge v. LoveAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
  4. Georgianna v. GizzyNew York Supreme Court · 1984

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Matthews v. Amberwood Associates Ltd. Partnership, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  2. Eric Gross and Adrianne Gross v. Elizabeth Turner and Antonio FloresSupreme Court of Vermont · 2018
  3. Shields v. WagmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  4. Stokes v. LyddyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  5. Donchin v. GuerreroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API