Legal Opinion

City of Barre v. Barre & Chelsea Railroad

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided February 6, 1924PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButler, J.

The plaintiff seeks to recover the amount of an assessment against the defendant on account of certain street improvements. The ease was heard on an agreed statement of facts, and to the judgment for the plaintiff the defendant excepts. Acting under authority of its charter, the city drained, paved, graded, curbed, and guttered the street in question, and assessed the abutting land owners proportionately, according to the frontage of their land on the street for a portion of the expense. The land on account of which the defendant was assessed is its right of way twenty feet wide, used solely…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Matter of City of New York (Juniper Ave.)New York Court of Appeals · 1922
  2. City of Boston v. Boston & Albany RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
  3. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Mt. Pleasant Bor. v. Balt. & O. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
  5. Barnes v. DyerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1884

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In Re Assessment for Improving Superior StreetSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  2. In the Matter of Chicago and North Western Railway CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 1952
  3. City of Barre v. Town of BethelSupreme Court of Vermont · 1929
  4. Wabash Ry. Co. v. City of St. LouisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
  5. City of San Diego v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1930

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API