Legal Opinion

State v. Nugent

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1899No. 3153PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Clarke County.—Hon. Abraham L. Miller, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Gordon, C. J.

The defendant was convicted of the crime of incest. Por a reversal of the judgment he relies upon a single assignment of error. The question presented is, can the crime of incest be committed without the concurrent consent of both parties to the sexual act ? That it cannot has been held in numerous cases: De Groat v. People, 39 Mich. 124; Baumer v. State, 49 Ind. 544 (19 Am. Rep. 691); State v. Thomas, 53 Iowa, 214 (4 N. W. 908); State v. Jarvis, 20 Ore. 437 (23 Am. St. Rep. 141); Yoeman v. State, 21 Neb. 171 (31 N. W. 69).

*523The doctrine…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. HurdSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  2. People v. KaiserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. State v. ChambersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893
  4. Commonwealth v. BakemanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
  5. State v. JarvisOregon Supreme Court · 1891

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. AkerWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Signs v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. McCaskill v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
  4. State v. WinslowUtah Supreme Court · 1906
  5. David v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1903

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API