T.R. v. Cora Priest's Day Care Center
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtPetrich, J.
Minor children, through their guardian ad litem, seek damages from a day-care center for sexual moles*107tation. Through the discovery process, facts developed suggesting the children's dysfunctional families may be the cause of their psychological or emotional problems. The daycare center sought an order under CR 35 to require that the plaintiffs' parents undergo psychological testing.1 The Superior Court granted the request, but limited the examination to those areas affecting the mental condition of the children.2 The minor children sought and were granted discretionary review of the trial…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Edward L. Scharf in Behalf of Laura Patricia Scharf, a Minor v. United States Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- James J. Acosta, Sr. v. Tenneco Oil Company and Mobil Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Beach v. BeachCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
- Fong Sik Leung, as Guardian Ad Litem for Fong Gar Hong v. John Foster Dulles, as Secretary of StateCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.