Legal Opinion

Emmart v. Piper Aircraft Corp.

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided May 7, 1987No. 85-6321-Civ, 85-8708-Civ and 85-1419-CivPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO APPLY INDIANA LAW

SPELLMAN, District Judge.

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on Defendants’, PIPER AIRCRAFT CORPORATION and TELEDYNE CONTINENTAL MOTORS, Motion to Apply Indiana Law in these consolidated actions involving a plane crash in Indiana, in which three Indiana residents, who at the time of the crash were either employees or officers of a distributor of Defendant Piper Aircraft Corporation (“Piper”), were killed. Under Florida conflicts of law principles, which this Court must apply, Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Elec. Mfg. Co., 313 U.S. 487, 61…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Bishop v. Florida Specialty Paint Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1980
  3. United States v. AnayaDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1980
  4. Peoples Bank and Trust Co. v. Piper Aircraft Corp.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1984

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Torrington Co. v. StutzmanTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  2. In Re Disaster at Detroit Metropolitan Airport on August 16, 1987District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1989
  3. Pycsa Panama, S.A. v. Tensar Earth Technologies, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2008
  4. In Re Aircrash Disaster Near Roselawn, IndianaDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
  5. Montgomery v. New Piper Aircraft, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API