Peoples Bank and Trust Co. v. Piper Aircraft Corp.
District Court, S.D. Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
GONZALEZ, District Judge.
The issue raised in this case is whether, under the “significant relationships test”, the law of Ohio — where the plaintiff decedent lived, and purchased and hangared his airplane — or the law of Florida — where the defendant airplane company now resides— should be applied in resolving the legal issues arising out of decedent’s fatal airplane crash in Ohio. Defendant Piper Aircraft Corporation (“Piper Aircraft” or “Piper”) has moved to apply Ohio law, while plaintiff argues that the law of Florida should control. The court has considered the arguments raised by…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Allstate Insurance v. HagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Bishop v. Florida Specialty Paint Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1980
- Martin v. United Security Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1975
- State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. OlsenSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Robert McK Foster, as Personal Representative of the Estates of Almon O. Thompson, Deceased, and Doris E. Thompson, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Eye Care International, Inc. v. UnderhillDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2000
- Montgomery v. New Piper Aircraft, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2002
- In Re Air Crash Disaster at Stapleton Intern.District Court, D. Colorado · 1988
- Emmart v. Piper Aircraft Corp.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.