State Ex Rel. Kemper v. Vincent
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
MICHAEL A. WOLFF, Chief Justice.
Does the constitutional prohibition of double jeopardy bar a second trial after a court-declared mistrial in the first trial? The inquiry in this case centers on whether granting a mistrial was a “manifest necessity.”
The state introduced Sandra Kemper’s confessions to setting a fatal fire in her home. The confessions came after police told Kemper that she had failed a polygraph test. The trial court permitted Kemper’s defense to introduce the results of the polygraph that showed she did not fail it; some of the details of her confession were inconsistent with…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Crane v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- State v. FasseroSupreme Court of Missouri · 2008
- State v. WardSupreme Court of Missouri · 2008
- State v. A.O.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2009
- State of Missouri v. Christopher L. CollingsSupreme Court of Missouri · 2014
- People v. MunizColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.