Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Kemper v. Vincent

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided May 16, 2006No. SC87246PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MICHAEL A. WOLFF, Chief Justice.

Does the constitutional prohibition of double jeopardy bar a second trial after a court-declared mistrial in the first trial? The inquiry in this case centers on whether granting a mistrial was a “manifest necessity.”

The state introduced Sandra Kemper’s confessions to setting a fatal fire in her home. The confessions came after police told Kemper that she had failed a polygraph test. The trial court permitted Kemper’s defense to introduce the results of the polygraph that showed she did not fail it; some of the details of her confession were inconsistent with…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Crane v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. State v. FasseroSupreme Court of Missouri · 2008
  2. State v. WardSupreme Court of Missouri · 2008
  3. State v. A.O.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2009
  4. State of Missouri v. Christopher L. CollingsSupreme Court of Missouri · 2014
  5. People v. MunizColorado Court of Appeals · 2008

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API