Legal Opinion
Corrigan v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 8, 2017No. Civil Action No. 2012-0173PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BERYL A. HOWELL, Chief Judge
The plaintiff, Matthew Corrigan, brought this lawsuit, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, against the District of Columbia and over twenty named and unnamed officers of the Metropolitan Police Department (“MPD”), seeking damages for violation of his Fourth Amendment rights arising from a warrantless search of his home on February 3, 2010. See generally Compl., ECF No. 1; First Am. Compl. (“FAC”), ECF No. 11. During the ensuing litigation, twenty-two of the individual defendants were dismissed voluntarily by the plaintiff or their motions to dismiss or…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Smith v. Dist. of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Beach Tv Properties Inc. v. SolomanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
- Burns v. Georgetown University Medical CenterDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- Klotzbach-Piper v. National Railroad Passenger CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
- Mencias Avila v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.