Legal Opinion

In re the Will of James Paul Allen

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 6, 2017No. COA16-1209PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZACHARY, Judge.

*692 Hope Paiyton Robinson and Christian Ann Robinson (the caveators) appeal from an order granting summary judgment in favor of Melvin Ray Woolard (the propounder). On appeal, the caveators argue that the trial court erred by ruling that handwritten notes on a will executed by James Paul Allen (the decedent) constituted a valid holographic codicil to the decedent's will. We conclude that the caveators' argument has merit.

I. Factual and Procedural Background

On 29 August 2002, the decedent executed a typewritten will drafted by Mr. William Mayo, an attorney who represented the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Forbis v. NealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2007
  2. In Re the Will of JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2008
  3. Craig Ex Rel. Craig v. New Hanover County Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2009
  4. In Re Appeal of the Greens of Pine Glen Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2003
  5. DeWitt v. Eveready Battery Co., Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2002

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cole v. Bonaparte'S Retreat Prop. Owners' Ass'n, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
  2. In re Will of AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2018
  3. Hendrix v. TantemsapyaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
  4. In re: HendrixCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API