Legal Opinion

In re Will of Allen

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 7, 2018No. 227PA17PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEWBY, Justice.

*398 **665 This case presents the question of whether a handwritten codicil that references a provision of a self-proving will is valid. The intent of the testator controls, and the language of the codicil must inform as to that intent. In this case the self-proving will and holographic codicil together clearly evince testamentary intent by simply referencing the applicable portion of the will to amend. Nonetheless, a genuine issue of material fact exists whether the phrase "begin[n]ing 7-7-03" shows the testator's then-present testamentary intent. Accordingly, this issue is not…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. In Re the Will of JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2008
  2. Dobson v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  3. Thompson v. Wake County Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  4. Marcus Bros. Textiles, Inc. v. Price Waterhouse, LLPSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
  5. Ussery v. Branch Banking & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2015

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re: GreenamyerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2026
  2. Waters v. PumphreyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022
  3. Waters v. PumphreyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API